In Regards to "The Great Fragmentation".

Jon Evans in his article The great Fragmentation, explores some interesting ideas concerning individuality and micro communities forming across the Internet. In an interesting passage he comments on his beliefs that this fragmenting of the mainstream is a positive turn of events, 

"A society in which people accept that their personal views generally are and will remain minority perspectives, rather than seeking to impose “normal” beliefs and tastes on any who don’t fit in, is enormously healthier, both culturally and politically. Given time, maybe this social transformation could even fragment American politics beyond its infantile two-party divide, into a genuine three-or-more-party democracy like the rest of the West enjoys".

I agree with Evans wholeheartedly. A large group of people with the exact same ideals and beliefs is not only unhealthy, but also dangerous. One can look to history for examples of the destruction groupthink has wreaked on mankind. From the Crusades to Isis, and multiple evils in between. 

Every individual human being is born with a distinct personality with distinct gifts and attributes. Through the combination of nature and nurture we evolve into adults with individual beliefs, ideals and interests. It is this individuality that has brought about some of the greatest inventions of mankind. We would not be flying if it wasn't for the nutcase Wright brothers. If Tesla was forced to fit into the mainstream, well he'd have been locked up in an insane asylum. Setting aside individuality and personal interests to be part of a norm essentially cuts the individual off from their personal interests and ideas. There is a reason "thinking out of the box" became such a popular saying during the 90's. With the dawn of the Internet, society as a whole, realized that fitting in did not instigate change or development. 

The Crusades are probably the best example of the death and destruction that is caused by groupthink. Be it religion, political, or moral beliefs and ideals when large groups of people come together and damn all those who do not think or act or believe as they do insanity ensues. As Evans pointed out, the two party system in the US is a great example of this insanity as well. 

When individuals reach out to others with similar beliefs and they foster many different ideas and beliefs this creates an eclectic web of connections. Sam likes skydiving, photography and scuba diving; she is a libertarian with personal spiritual beliefs she chooses to ponder alone. Ben is a conservative Christian, who also likes skydiving and photography. Sam and Ben form a friendship and affinity through their shared interests, and allow each to pursue their religious and political beliefs on their own. This is how man can transcend the hate. 

It has always been my personal belief that live and let live is the ideal way to approach life. Though it is important to ensure that lives are not lost or harmed while pursuing individuality, I honestly believe that it is how life should be approached.